我们还能不能接纳有效措施来解决人类对动植物造成的负面影响呢？The human activities have negative effects on the plants and animal species. Some think it is too late to do anything about it while others suggest taking effective actions to solve it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 陈益民老师原创范文参考Over the years, human activities, such as pollution, deforestation, and urbanization have greatly narrowed the space for other species on the earth, or even threatened their existence. Some believe the damage is irreversible and thus we could do nothing, while others persist in carrying out effective measures to alleviate the current situation. To make a wise decision, a careful discussion of the above two views is needed. Throughout history, varieties of examples may serve as good reasons to those pessimists. They claim that no matter how we try now, it is impossible to revive those extinct species, such as the thylacine that died off since 1963 due to its lack of food on this planet. Besides, even when we can bring them into life again, and even when we hope to protect those endangered ones, there is no room available for them to survive, take the dinosaurs for example, because few people would return to the past and hand over the land to those wild species. In addition, just as the natural law defines “only the fittest can survive”, it is meaningless to maintain the weak ones on the earth, unless they themselves are able to continue their life.However, we can not leave things like this to go on; otherwise, the doomsday for human beings will come soon. Firstly, overexploitation of natural resources should be reduced. Hunting and smuggling of wild animals and plants should be banned; overgrazing and over cultivation should be stopped, and utilization of irreplaceable fuel sources such as coal and oil should be slowed down, so that we could have a sustainable development. Furthermore, damages to the nature, as well as the wild creatures, ought to be restricted. The decrease in the use of fertilizer and pesticides, the decline in deforestation and the reduction in pollution, can all contribute to a better ecology system to hold all the creatures on the earth. To sum up, both sides seem to be reasonable to some extent. However, personally, I tend to support the latter, because something is better than nothing, and we cannot sit and wait for our death without doing anything. 模拟写作和语言提高，从范文翻译比对开始！近些年来，污染、滥发森林、都会化，诸如此类的人类运动极大地缩减了地球上其它物种的生活空间，甚至威胁到它们的生存。有些人认为这些伤害是无可挽回的，因为我们也无能为力，可是另一些人坚持实施有效的措施来减缓当前的局势。

下结论前，需要仔细讨论上述两方看法。纵观历史，我们可以找出许多例子来支持这些消极的人的想法，他们声称让那些灭绝的动物重生是不行能的，即便我们用尽全力，好比从1963年开始袋狼就因为缺乏食物而从地球上消失了。另有，即即是我们能够让它们复生，有心掩护这些濒危动物，地球上也没有空间给它们生存了，拿恐龙做个例子，很少有人会想回到已往，把土地交回给野生动物。此外，如“适者生存”的规则而言，把弱势物种留在地球上也是无意的，除非它们自身有能力生存下去。

然而，我们不能放手不管，让事情这么生长下去，否则，人类的末日也就不远了。首先，要淘汰对自然资源的过分开采；克制猎杀和走私野生动物；停止过分放牧和开垦；要淘汰对诸如煤炭和石油这样的不行再生能源的开发，这样我们才气拥有可连续生长。

进一步，要限制对野生生物和自然的伤害。淘汰化肥和杀虫剂的使用、淘汰森林砍伐和污染排放都有助于构建一个良好的生态系统，得以把所有的生物留在地球上。总之，从某种水平而言，两方都有理。

然而，我小我私家支持后者，因为做了总好过不做，我们不能坐着等候我们的末日。

本文来源：欧亿体育-www.ghqmg.com